Integrity of artistic image for writing an analysis of literary work

Integrity of artistic image for writing an analysis of literary work

Consciousness can work as a psyche, while the psyche as a awareness. As being a foundation, the prerequisites for creative imagination, these edges are inseparably in theory. In technology, we depend on a consciousness that operates with essences, wanting to eliminate feelings and experiences. In art and literature, emotion contains thought, in thought – emotion. The image is a synthesis of consciousness and psyche, ideas and feelings.

What’s the basis for creative creativity in literary analysis?

This is apparently the true basis of artistic creativity, which can be feasible just because awareness and psyche, being autonomous spheres, are in the time that is same connected. Its impractical to lower the image to the concept (towards the objective of the concepts): we should distract ourselves from thoughts. To lessen the image microeconomic problems examples to direct experience methods to „not notice” the turnover regarding the psyche, being able to be fraught with thought.

Nevertheless, the integrity associated with the image isn’t just a sensually sensed thought (concept). The image just isn’t yet an easy method of this presence of simultaneously concepts that are severala system of concepts). The image is basically multivalued, it simultaneously contains several aspects. Technology can not pay for this. Concepts reduce an object (trend) to at least one aspect, as much as one moment, intentionally abstracting from all others. Science explores phenomena analytically with subsequent synthesis, exercising most of the moments of interrelation. Art, but, believes when it comes to the definitions. Moreover, the existence of the sum meanings is a vital condition for the „life” of this image that is artistic. It is impractical to determine what is the true meaning, what is the „more important” meaning.

Concept of artistic notion of literary work

Theoretically, artistic content may be reduced to a clinical, up to a logically developed system of concepts. However in training this can be impossible, which is not essential. We are working with the abyss of definitions. Even within the issue of the look of brand new overtones that are semantic new deep definitions, about „self-production” of definitions in traditional works. Since a work may be understood towards the end only if absolutely the logical unfolding of pictures is realized, it could be argued that the ability of a highly artistic tasks are an endless process.

So, the image is indecomposable. Its perception can only just be holistic: as an event of thought, as a sensually perceived essence. Which is why the scientific analysis associated with the tasks are a „double general” cognition of creative integrity: besides that the inexhaustibility of definitions can’t be paid down to a method, with such cognition, the adequate perception of emotions – empathy – is kept out from the brackets.

The utmost complete perception regarding the object that is aesthetic always multifaceted:

  • empathy,
  • co-creation,
  • method of integrity through scientific dialectical logic.

Just What provides the richness up to a work that is literary?

This will be an aesthetic (indistinguishable) perception. It is usually one-time, one-act. Completely alert to the truth that the integrity of a work of art cannot be exhaustively described into the formal language of science, we come across only 1 method of systematic comprehension of the integrity: it should be studied as a method that tends to its limitation (this is certainly, e turning into its opposing). The critic that is literary not have to do anything else, like analyzing a work supposedly as something, holding constantly at heart it is perhaps not the machine, but integrity. Another intuitive method of product is achievable, and also necessary, however it is not taught. These approaches should really be mutually complementary, perhaps not exclusive. It will additionally be borne in your mind that any artistically reproduced image of the planet can be a decrease (the entire globe can never be reflected). To be able to replicate the paid off picture of this globe, to generate a „model of life”, a certain artistic code is required. This code should therefore lessen the world, so that it is possible to state the author’s worldview. Such code can’t be a graphic by itself. A holistic creative image with all its unique opportunities continues to be only a way, a way.

What’s the richness of this image? The clear answer, apparently, can just only be one: a person.